|
20 December 2010
Posted in
Comment -
Culture
Justin Bieber at Q102 Jingle Ball. Photo: Stephen Eckert
Zac Efron for President and People called ‘Cher’.
I’m not one for sensationalism; yet looking at the news these past weeks has led me to believe that this is an important statement to make. People might actually care, well at least if I was a contestant on the X Factor. Excuse this cliché-filled piece. After all, it is Christmas! (Okay, stop rolling your eyes please, I thought that was quite good…)
I was always a believer that people are, to a great deal, a product of their circumstances. I don’t mean that in a condescending way, and neither do I say that in order to condone any sort of behaviour. But honestly, knowing how a person grew up, when and in what context I’ve found, has helped me appreciate them for their many depths. I too, have many depths, and have grown up a lot in this decade.
Yet, looking back, the decade in which I was raised doesn’t represent me much. To be fair, perhaps I don’t do such a great job of representing it. I got to thinking recently after looking through the top Yahoo! and Google searches this year and in years gone by. Apparently Britney Spears took the top spot for Yahoo from 2005-8, though this year was pushed down to a mere fifth place overall. In Google searches, The Independent tells us that the top searches are in fact “’Facebook’, ‘BBC’ and ‘Youtube’”. The things that occupy our time are really quite scary.
Among the rising ‘stars’ (and I mean that literally) have included the now infamous Lady Gaga (number 6, Entertainment), and of course at number one in this same category, and the third-fastest rising term overall, is Justin Bieber – the Canadian pop-sensation who’s won the hearts of a whole generation of Tweens. No not Michael Bublé. The other one.
It would be naïve of me to think that the popularity of certain Google search-terms represents the consciousness of the human species, but it has me thinking about what the computer-literate users of the world have come to prioritise in their quest for information. For example, the term ‘iPad’ has become the fastest-rising term in the Consumer Electronics category (followed only by the ‘iPhone 4’).
I look at the things people search for today, and I reflect upon a very turbulent decade; yet in this last year relatively trivial things seem to be sought out on the internet. But that’s hypocritical of me; what would I search for, or what would I remember from these past years?
I try to recall what sticks out to me in the news. Okay, in terms of international news, the tragedies of September 11, and the July 7 bombings; then come the two invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Obama becomes President, Castro steps down. Britain gets a Coalition Government for the first time in ages. Then I move on to disasters; I think of the Great Tsunami of ’04, hurricane Katrina in ’05, Haiti and the floods in Pakistan this year. I’m hard-pressed for much else. I only latterly remember the BP oil-spill. Then I try to think of the Pop Culture icons of the world; George Galloway behaves like a cat (he’s still my hero); Jade Goody died – that seemed to shake this nation for a while, and the death of Anna Nicole Smith and the subsequent custody battle that ensued; and James Brown was laid to rest. Perhaps the greatest shock to the world was the death of Michael Jackson (though interestingly this did wonders for his estate and those left behind). Other ‘human-interest’ pieces include the tragic disappearance of Madeline McCann; a woman is shot-dead on her honeymoon in South Africa; the rise of a very odd bunch of Tween-stars as produced by Disney (that High School Musical craze filtered even into my University) and by Stephanie Meyer (author of the Twilight ‘saga’); Piers Morgan takes over from Larry King (!) Oh, and something about Sarah Palin.
Here comes the social criticism…It’s quite interesting, at least for me, that I was able to recall so much pop-culture related news; I don’t even follow it so much. Unlike the rest of the newsworthy bunch, this seems more positive and hopeful than even Obama’s inauguration.
But I am becoming increasingly cognisant of the fact that for those of us who had the privilege of being born into previous decades, we remember still what it is like to not own our own computers, to visit libraries regularly, use a landline telephone for communication. This goes beyond nostalgia. This decade has been one of human consumption; to use a quote Zig Ziglar (America’s Master Motivator) once said, we have become ‘spectators to life’. I mean, think about it, this is the generation for whom voting is something you do over the phone for a contestant on a reality show or talent contest; sending a message requires limited thought and is no-longer a private affair; planning for a journey requires two minutes in front of a computer (or increasingly, the use of a Smart Phone) and requires almost no life-skills or time-management or organisation of self; television can be recorded around your increasingly ‘hectic’ lifestyle (for which you spend much of your time sitting before your Lord Computer Screen – and to be honest can download whatever television you deign to watch if you’re savvy enough – or so I hear…), an iPod becomes the tool of choice to fill in the void whilst commuting, working, even in social situations. I re-iterate; we spend most of our times these days as consumers and spectators, not movers and shakers. Yet I do all these things all the time.
What will we be remembered for in years to come? Can you imagine an era where Simon Cowell will be studied for his impact on society? Will Lady Gaga stand out as this decade’s leading humanitarian for wearing a costume made of meat? Will the cast of High School Musical, or even the Harry Potter films, assume positions of political power one day? Will Angelina Jolie single-handedly solve the various crises of Africa? – Madonna may help of course…
I dare say that in fifteen odd years from now, our generation – the future parents of this world – will be complaining about how lazy our kids have become; we may be complaining of the fact that they all seem to have some sort of attention-related disorder, and a vast range of then-classifiable behavioural problems. Not to fear of course – I heard in one seminar that an American drug company is developing a pill to overcome shyness in teenagers, so it’s not all doom and gloom.
Moving away from the ridiculous; let us briefly ponder over the other reality that exists. The one of celebrity, popularity and glamour is one filled with music and hope. Not necessarily my sort of music, and perhaps a slightly short-sighted hopefulness. But the other world; the one of politics, war and poverty, amongst other things, is merely peppered with hope. Two years on, are we really as optimistic about President Obama? Will he have to participate in Strictly Come Dancing to regain any credibility, twenty years from now? Will British students be ConDemned to an educational apartheid? Will nuclear war have broken out between the USA and North Korea?
The point I’m trying to make is this: What other world are we creating? I write this partly in response to Yasmin Alibhai-Brown’s piece in The Independent on “Ann Widdecombe and the rise of Strictly Come Democracy”; where in her concluding line she writes, rather aptly, “meanwhile, as I said, Britannia turns to ash.” I understand her point. It is definitely valid. But as makers of this Brave New World I’m beginning to see the benefit of the distractions of celebrity, computer screens and consumer culture. It is unfair that our children be forced to view the world through the increasingly cynical and pessimistic lens of the press. It is not their fault that our world crumbles around them; they have no stake in this world. As Shami Chakrabarty said recently (I paraphrase), the youth didn’t put the hole in the ozone layer, nor did they create this world of debt. It is for the adult generation to manage first. Leave to the children for now the glamorous world (with its many imperfections and vices) of X-Factor and Strictly Come Dancing!
Artificial realities are so much better than this one. As the decade winds to a close, mankind at large – particularly in the industrial world – must take a long, hard look in the mirror and see in which direction it is headed. I’m not a cynical person by nature; yet looking at decision-makers of the world leaves little room for hope as far as I’m concerned. In the meantime, I take comfort in the fact that as the world gets more depressing – to the level where sheer apathy will be the default political setting for every man, woman and child – we in the world will produce more hopeful, passionate and positive distractions to plug into as reality passes us on by.
Thus I say, raise your glasses to, and God bless, Justin Bieber. My ever-increasing source of hope.
Comments:
| < Prev |
|---|
Imraan Sumar
Imraan Sumar is a copy editor for The Student Journals and reads History student at School of Oriental & African Studies.



Comments
Thanks for the comments. You know what, I find it very hard proscribe anything related to the circumstances that I'm trying to critique. The honest answer would be that I simply don't know where to go from here. It's almost as if it's a problem simply beyond individual agency; the irony is that my critique of this problem simply feeds into it - my reference to celebrity culture and the problems of technology invariably encourage their 'googling', and proliferate the use of media. The two things go hand-in-hand; there is an almost democratic element to the celebrity culture we're facing, because it is so easy for each and every individual to participate in its proliferation via personal computers. The same sort of criticism can be leveled at me as has that to the postmodernists of our time - that is that any statement/critique about these structures of power are merely a manipulation of myself by these very structures. The only thing that comes from making a critique such as this is 'understanding'; which occurs at some intuitive level that I hope others will then continue. Needless to say this intuitive understanding was imprinted on my psyche by Alibhai-Brown and other commentators. There is a hermeneutic experience involved that we just seem bound by. But we can hope. Unlike Che below I can't see, at least for some time yet, an effective revolutionary consciousness emerging in the next decade, and moreover unlike the Radical Left I don't think the fall of the Berlin Wall was a signifier of proletarian revolution in Europe. - Sarkozy and Merkel elected as popular leaders are my case in point.
Ok, away from the academic dribble. With regards to the positives of the decade; if I'm completely honest I am at a loss to recall what these might me. I can think of one major one; that the Western world has become a more tolerant place for minority groups and alternate lifestyles - something no-doubt encouraged by celebrity culture. However, the fallacy that we're submerged into as a society is that this is an altogether positive thing. People in the media impact a sort of liberal/libertarian shift in thinking, and thus make this place a more harmonious place to live in. Celebrity culture of course leads to the moral decay at some level of society, because it simply removes individual agency from thinking. Cult figures influence people greatly - Sajida points to Angelina Jolie - look at her personal life?! Again, her very open personal life in relation to that other Hollywood actor intuitively this imprints a moral point of view on people and the media - almost to the point now where there is apathy regarding how she became one half of a power-couple in Hollywood. That scares me.
Aside from that - I was glad to see the international response regarding Pakistan (though again prior to this our government supported its dictator - ironic right?). There was more outright condemnation during the Gaza massacre a couple of years back, though the US still remains a spectator and facilitator to it despite Obama. More irony I'd say. Of course these are matters of personal politics, but I hope my point comes across.
To be entirely honest I can't see how we're much better off than we were ten years ago; though I'm looking to be convinced.
Before this becomes another article, I best end here. I'd love to hear what you think.
To you health,
Thanks for the comments. It is a bit disheartening that the public is fitting a rather American archetype. However, this goes beyond cultural comparisons; I'm beginning to think that this is a porblem for the industrial/developed/Western World at large, as opposed to an American-led phenomenon.
Also, I am concerned with the fact that if the rise of celebrity is because people are in search of role-models, then people do appear to be looking in the wrong places. I mean, Angelina Jolie - really?
I'm afraid that it's going beyond that - in nfact the cult of celebrity and one's dreams to become famous for the sake of fame and recognition alone is rather worrying; the powers that be, and society at large no longer empowers people to feel secure as ordinary people. Their agency is stripped from them because they feel they are unable to make a difference unless they reach a position of celebrity.
Don't worry, the irony wasn't wasted on me! Merry Christmas!
Bless his soul. I've become something of a Belieber recently. I don't think he realise what a tool he is. I don't mean that as an insult (though I thought that sentence was friggin hilarious); but he's a tool of some power mechanism and he will continue to be forced upon us.
To be honest, the proliferation of the social media is genius - it's what's facilitating the lack of attention spans of our generation. And again, it's a brilliant mechanism for proliferating such illnesses.
I can't believe he was found in Burma. That does make me think we're doomed. I mean, no Lady Gaga?
Justin Bieber aside though, you raise some really good points - I think there is too much of an onus on the youth of today to fix the fuck ups of the past generations when quite frankly, it would be nice if the people who caused the problems could help out too.
And the behavioural problems part just makes me shudder - it's far too close to the truth.
We should admire and emulate the likes of Julian Assange and Bradley Manning. They might torture Manning but his leaks will live on and his message of freedom of information will live on. Exposing the corruption and spreading truth.
Fyi. as talented as he may be in the system I'm not trying to promote Justin Bieber ;)
You reach some good conclusions, aside from your gran bein a workin gal. I think its important to note the importance of the western media's smoke screen over the public. We'd rather read about justin biebers relationship status over the 1.4million human beings killed in iraq as a result of an on-going illegal unjustified invasion... Im a belieber that one day the people will unite against corruption and overthrow the superpowers that are causing destruction and systematic genocide and basically doing what benefits them against the will of the people.